The Matrix vs The Matrix Sequels

[NEM0]

After having rewatched The Matrix Trilogy last week, I got to thinking about why the sequels were less successful than the first movie. I can say I enjoyed the cinematography of The Matrix more than its sequels, but the sequels aren't SERIOUSLY flawed in that department. I had no major complaints in that area. My only real thought about it is the originality of the first movie was awe-inspiring to the audience. The reveal of the Real World is shocking and kind of terrifying. The whole concept was so fresh that the movie was more enjoyable for some, whereas a similar movie without the benefit of the awesome story reveal wouldn't be as attractive to those people. And then to go on to another movie, without any more MAJOR revelations, a lot of people lost interest in the bread and butter of the trilogy; deep meaning hidden under some kung fu, bullet time, and killer robots lol (massive oversimplification but you get my point). A complaint I have heard from people is that the action sequences were much too long. Losing interest in the story line could explain why these fights fell flat to some people. But I find it hard to watch those sequences, suppressing my love for the story, and not at least think "wow, this is some awesome shit". Idk this is basically some rambling from a confused fan, but I thought I'd pose it as a rant/question to some fellow Matrix fans.

Am I missing some flaws in the sequels that might change my mind? Some people had a problem with where the story went, I personally didn't. I loved the whole story start to finish.

Were the fight sequences less satisfying in the sequels? Too long? Too over the top? Didn't serve the plot in the sequels as much as in the first (ie action for the sake of action)?

Any input would be appreciated